![]() Signs of possible habitation were present in the relatively isolated location which permitted the transient to start a fire. FIE investigated the claim and determined that the fire was started as a result of an uncontrolled warming fire started by an unauthorized inhabitant. On December 20, 2011, Ong tendered a claim to FIE for property damage sustained as a result of a fire earlier on December 20, 2011. Gas and electric utilities were turned off on that date. ![]() Exch., 235 Cal.App.4th 901 (April 3, 2015), the California Second District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of Fire Insurance Exchange (“FIE”) in connection with the application of a “vandalism or malicious mischief” exclusion to a property loss caused by a fire started by a transient while staying in property owned by the plaintiff, Hung Van Ong (“Ong”).Īs of February, 2010, the property was vacant. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |